Re: My Sud Super restoration project
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2016 6:18 pm
Thank you to everyone for the positive comments and encouragement regarding my project over the last few days.
I know there are many experienced and skilled enthusiasts on the forum who know a lot more about restoration techniques than I do. This is only my second project in 25 years, the last proper restoration I did was back in 1992/3 of a Bertone 2000 GTV which was sold in 1998 when I moved to London. I am a bit rusty (if you will pardon the pun) in terms of my knowledge of current techniques and suppliers - as well as the model specific problems and fixes that apply when restoring the 900 series Alfa Romeos.
In answer to the various questions and points made recently I would comment as follows:
To Kegsti66 - in answer to your "Columbo" question, the same fabricator rebuilt the red series 1 Ti shell during March/April last year and that partly explains his skill at repairing Alfasud body shells. The series 1 Ti is a project I have been involved with on and off since 2011 when I found the car - it has been a slow burner and is a shared effort with another party who owns the car and who unfortunately has not been keen to feature it on any of the forums. I will try again to persuade him to let me showcase the restoration on CAF, as it is going to be amazing when completed and will feature a huge number of NOS parts that were collected over a ten year period for just such a project.
To dralf1965 - regarding the link with Mario Deliotti - yes I have the silver plastic dealer name plates on the sills when you open the doors, my car has four - one for each door.
There is some interesting background info about Mario Deliotti here: http://forums.autosport.com/topic/16334 ... -deliotti/
To Alfa_Japan - regarding the wing rail corner brackets - yes we did think about the effect of deleting the cut-out in terms of additional rigidity in the upper A pillar area and decided that it was unlikely to cause a problem as the original brackets are already quite robust (if you see them in their original rust free state). The brackets have a flange pressed into them around the aperture to make them stronger and are quite domed in shape. Once you add the triangular brace underneath they are already quite strong. The new brackets will be a bit more rigid, but as the car is only used on relatively smooth surfaced roads and not for things like track days or rallying there should not be abnormal or undue stresses that might cause something as severe as chassis rail or inner wing cracking.
To Gary Orchard - the polyurethane foam in the Alfasud saloons and Sprints is a strange story. If you go back to the first press pack issued in June 1972 there is a diagram covering noise suppression measures that shows where the foam is located. As you say it is in the front and rear chassis rails, the double section of the inner bulkhead, the box section bit of the wing rails and up into the front screen pillars. The 1976 Sprint press pack included a similar diagram to the saloons showing the location of the foam. Later on in the Suds production life (when the series 2 cars were launched with the Alfasud Super in 1977) Alfa Romeo were battling the Suds rust problems and claimed to have made a whole host of improvements to this effect. One of them was the polyurethane foam, which was now said to be part of the new anti-corrosion protection measures! If nothing else Alfa Romeo were at least capable of creative marketing during the 1970's.
On my car we will only remove the foam from the wing rails as it does not seem to be causing a problem anywhere else. The main reason we took it out of the wing rails was because we needed to remake the outer panels as part of fixing the A pillars and corner brackets, which had all been messed up by poor quality previous repairs. This provided a good opportunity to get rid of the foam and avoid the toxic fumes it gives off when you carry out any welding work in close proximity to it.
To Junior regarding the repairs being largely hidden - yes they are but I am pleased that this car is getting restored properly and in-depth because it has been in our family for nearly 40 years now and is an old friend. With that in mind I am not unhappy to spend a bit more on getting everything right, even in places where you will never see it and as you say knowing that it will be durable and not require further structural repair work in the future will provide peace of mind - because as we all know these cars are not very durable in the body shell department at the best of times.
Restoration update:
I have received a good number of new pictures from the fabricator who has now completed the wing rails, A pillars and corner brackets as well as fitting new sills both sides and repairing rear jacking points and rear wheel arch/sill joints. I will post a selection of these this coming week when I have time.
I know there are many experienced and skilled enthusiasts on the forum who know a lot more about restoration techniques than I do. This is only my second project in 25 years, the last proper restoration I did was back in 1992/3 of a Bertone 2000 GTV which was sold in 1998 when I moved to London. I am a bit rusty (if you will pardon the pun) in terms of my knowledge of current techniques and suppliers - as well as the model specific problems and fixes that apply when restoring the 900 series Alfa Romeos.
In answer to the various questions and points made recently I would comment as follows:
To Kegsti66 - in answer to your "Columbo" question, the same fabricator rebuilt the red series 1 Ti shell during March/April last year and that partly explains his skill at repairing Alfasud body shells. The series 1 Ti is a project I have been involved with on and off since 2011 when I found the car - it has been a slow burner and is a shared effort with another party who owns the car and who unfortunately has not been keen to feature it on any of the forums. I will try again to persuade him to let me showcase the restoration on CAF, as it is going to be amazing when completed and will feature a huge number of NOS parts that were collected over a ten year period for just such a project.
To dralf1965 - regarding the link with Mario Deliotti - yes I have the silver plastic dealer name plates on the sills when you open the doors, my car has four - one for each door.
There is some interesting background info about Mario Deliotti here: http://forums.autosport.com/topic/16334 ... -deliotti/
To Alfa_Japan - regarding the wing rail corner brackets - yes we did think about the effect of deleting the cut-out in terms of additional rigidity in the upper A pillar area and decided that it was unlikely to cause a problem as the original brackets are already quite robust (if you see them in their original rust free state). The brackets have a flange pressed into them around the aperture to make them stronger and are quite domed in shape. Once you add the triangular brace underneath they are already quite strong. The new brackets will be a bit more rigid, but as the car is only used on relatively smooth surfaced roads and not for things like track days or rallying there should not be abnormal or undue stresses that might cause something as severe as chassis rail or inner wing cracking.
To Gary Orchard - the polyurethane foam in the Alfasud saloons and Sprints is a strange story. If you go back to the first press pack issued in June 1972 there is a diagram covering noise suppression measures that shows where the foam is located. As you say it is in the front and rear chassis rails, the double section of the inner bulkhead, the box section bit of the wing rails and up into the front screen pillars. The 1976 Sprint press pack included a similar diagram to the saloons showing the location of the foam. Later on in the Suds production life (when the series 2 cars were launched with the Alfasud Super in 1977) Alfa Romeo were battling the Suds rust problems and claimed to have made a whole host of improvements to this effect. One of them was the polyurethane foam, which was now said to be part of the new anti-corrosion protection measures! If nothing else Alfa Romeo were at least capable of creative marketing during the 1970's.
On my car we will only remove the foam from the wing rails as it does not seem to be causing a problem anywhere else. The main reason we took it out of the wing rails was because we needed to remake the outer panels as part of fixing the A pillars and corner brackets, which had all been messed up by poor quality previous repairs. This provided a good opportunity to get rid of the foam and avoid the toxic fumes it gives off when you carry out any welding work in close proximity to it.
To Junior regarding the repairs being largely hidden - yes they are but I am pleased that this car is getting restored properly and in-depth because it has been in our family for nearly 40 years now and is an old friend. With that in mind I am not unhappy to spend a bit more on getting everything right, even in places where you will never see it and as you say knowing that it will be durable and not require further structural repair work in the future will provide peace of mind - because as we all know these cars are not very durable in the body shell department at the best of times.
Restoration update:
I have received a good number of new pictures from the fabricator who has now completed the wing rails, A pillars and corner brackets as well as fitting new sills both sides and repairing rear jacking points and rear wheel arch/sill joints. I will post a selection of these this coming week when I have time.